Comments

252 Comments

Ugh, late to the party! Breaks wifi here:

05:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation Wireless-AC 9260 (rev 29)

Bug filed: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1733369

karma

Works well! Thanks!

BZ#1720757 Review Request: pew - Tool to manage multiple virtualenvs written in pure Python
karma

Works OK here---no weirdness noted

karma

Works OK here in general usage

Works OK here

BZ#1691192 [abrt] gnome-shell: meta_gpu_kms_flip_crtc(): gnome-shell killed by SIGABRT
karma

Works well!

karma

DNF works well with this, no segfaults.

BZ#1694411 Segfault when using zchunk metadata

Got an error here:

Finish: run

03-18 10:39 root         DEBUG        CheckRpmlintInstalled completed: 46.150 seconds
03-18 10:39 root         DEBUG    Running check: CheckRpmlintDebuginfo
03-18 10:39 root         DEBUG        CheckRpmlintDebuginfo completed: 0.002 seconds
03-18 10:39 root         DEBUG    Running check: CheckInitDeps
03-18 10:39 root         DEBUG    Exception down the road...
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/review_helper.py", line 239, in run
    self._do_run(outfile)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/review_helper.py", line 229, in _do_run
    self._do_report(outfile)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/review_helper.py", line 99, in _do_report
    self._run_checks(self.bug.spec_file, self.bug.srpm_file, outfile)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/review_helper.py", line 118, in _run_checks
    writedown=not Settings.no_report)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/checks.py", line 378, in run_checks
    run_check(name)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/checks.py", line 352, in run_check
    check.run()
  File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/plugins/generic_build.py", line 358, in run
    deps.init()
  File "/usr/lib/python3.7/site-packages/FedoraReview/deps.py", line 36, in init
    'dnf'])
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.7/subprocess.py", line 395, in check_output
    **kwargs).stdout
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.7/subprocess.py", line 472, in run
    with Popen(*popenargs, **kwargs) as process:
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.7/subprocess.py", line 775, in __init__
    restore_signals, start_new_session)
  File "/usr/lib64/python3.7/subprocess.py", line 1453, in _execute_child
    restore_signals, start_new_session, preexec_fn)
TypeError: expected str, bytes or os.PathLike object, not NoneType
03-18 10:39 root         ERROR    Exception down the road...(logs in /home/asinha/.cache/fedora-review.log)
03-18 10:39 root         DEBUG    Report completed:  500.607 seconds

The command-line was: $ fedora-review -b 1649059

$ fedora-review -V
fedora-review version 0.7.0 dfc9dd8 2019-03-17 14:56:47 -0400
external plugins:

Unsure if this is a fedora-review bug, so not giving -1 just yet.

F28 I meant, sorry!

karma

This was a Fedora 29 server machine. I got this warning: "WARNING: 'edid-decode' package is not installed". Should it be added as suggests?

BZ#1655421 Review Request: hw-probe - A tool to check operability of computer hardware

I get "ERROR: the probe is larger than 400K". Not a bug I reckon, but I cannot figure out how to work around it. Any suggestions?

For anyone else having trouble: setting the user agent to the one used by chrome fixes it: "Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Fedora; Linux x86_64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/65.0.3325.162 Safari/537.36"

I had thought so. 36 is very old.

I get the same message in qutebrowser and falkon, so it should be a qtwebengine issue. I'll check upstream and file an issue if one isn't filed already.

Cheers!

Works fine in general, but whatsapp web stopped working for me a few days ago and this update did not fix it.

It says that chrome36+ is required. How would one check what version of chrome/chromium is provided with qt5webengine?

Message screenshot here: https://ankursinha.fedorapeople.org/misc/qutebrowser-whatsapp-web.png

karma

Tested, works well. Thanks for the quick update :)

BZ#1401482 biber-2.11 is available
BZ#1639640 Biber and texlive-biblatex versions are incompatible

works OK in normal usage.

Work fine, no oddity noted.

Works well in general.