Comments

364 Comments
karma

works

Oh sorry. I didn't realize chromium-libs-media-freeworld wasn't required. So, I removed it and all is fine.

karma

works for me (x86_64) - no regression noted.

Update not possible due to unsolved dependencies:

Problem: problem with installed package chromium-libs-media-freeworld-63.0.3239.108-1.fc27.x86_64 - package chromium-libs-media-freeworld-63.0.3239.108-1.fc27.x86_64 requires chromium-libs(x86-64) = 63.0.3239.108-1.fc27, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install both chromium-libs-65.0.3325.181-1.fc27.x86_64 and chromium-libs-63.0.3239.108-1.fc27.x86_64 - package chromium-65.0.3325.181-1.fc27.x86_64 requires chromium-libs(x86-64) = 65.0.3325.181-1.fc27, but none of the providers can be installed - cannot install the best update candidate for package chromium-63.0.3239.108-1.fc27.x86_64

karma

Works. No regression experienced on T440s workstation

karma

works for me, no regression noted (T440s). default regression test passes.

karma

breaks module building - no good.

karma

works

works great!

karma

works for me

karma

works for me on my T440s. no regression noted, passed (default) kernel regression test.

karma

works for me (x86_64).

karma

works for me (x86_64). Default regression test failed (cachedrop).

karma

works for me (x86_64)

karma

I agree, it's not stable but it's not a regression - so it's not making things worse compared to 4.15.6, right?

On my two Intel workstations, this kernel works just fine. Thumbs up!

karma

works just fine.

karma

works, not regression noted.

works for me - no regression noted.

karma

Works for me on a Thinkpad 440s - no regression noted.