Comments

13 Comments

This update has been unpushed.

The ceph-common package was already in 7.2. This is a complementary package to that -- it contains the server bits on x86_64. Also, it contains the full package on ppc64 (we do not ship ceph-common in rhel on ppc64).

@ktdreyer: Both of these work as expected (*). It were only the packages that were in the repos twice (base + epel) and did not exist in upstream firefly repo (i.e. were split) that posed a problem, here.

(*) yum install python-cephfs won't install anything in that case -- python-cephfs is masked properly by yum-plugin-priorities wih check_obsoletes on. On the other hand, if you disable upsream repo and enable epel, it will install python-cephfs (with deps) as expected.

(*) yum install python-ceph will simply install python-ceph package from upstream firefly repo. On the other hand, if you disable upsream repo and enable epel repo, it will install python-ceph-compat (with deps) as expected.

btw: Testing on a rhel 7.2 with ceph + epel-testing repo enabled (and epel repo disabled), the 'yum install ceph-devel' command that failed previously works just fine, now.

@ktdreyer: I was not too happy to use it either but it is pretty safe given there is no actual source code change and the similar (drop two packages) change went through the usual 14-days long testing period without anyone arguing about it.

There is a librbd regression in 0.94.4, unpushing. 0.94.5 should be out in few days.

There is a librbd regression in 0.94.4, unpushing. 0.94.5 should be out in few days.

This update has been unpushed.

There is a linking problem with armv7 (#1222286). We need to rev the package with the patch that fixes the issue.

The AutoQA tries to install an i686 package on x86_64 arch but fails because it considers the i686 dependencies inferior on that architecture. Nothing to fix here.