BZ#2354466 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2354466)
BZ#2354466 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2354466)
BZ#2354466 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2354466)
BZ#2354465 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2354465)
BZ#2354466 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2354466)
Thanks a lot for having caught the issues and for having provided all these explanations! After having improved the documentation, it will help others (and us) in the future; appreciated :)
Thanks for having caught this misalignment!
I used the fedpkg build --target=f42-build-side-104367
command, but I guess it was too soon after the build of OpenPGM in the side tag. From what I have experienced, we need to wait at least 5-10 minutes in order for the build to find its way in the repo.
Another build is ongoing: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=128563713 I checked and this time, it is with OpenPGM 5.3.18, as expected.
The test on badfuncs fails because of the following two lines/functions in the source code:
_raw_address.sin_addr.s_addr = inet_addr (addr_str.c_str ());
/* To be replaced by something like: */
inet_pton (AF_INET, addr_str.c_str (), &_raw_address.sin_addr.s_addr);
const char *const name = inet_ntoa (addr_->sin_addr);
/* To be replaced by something like: */
char name[INET_ADDRSTRLEN];
inet_ntop(AF_INET, &addr_->sin_addr, name, INET_ADDRSTRLEN);
Reference:
As suggested, Fedora update for the side tag: FEDORA-2025-2a9f9bcfe6
Good catch, thanks!
#1873970 - openpgm-5-3-128 is available
#2340980 - opentrep: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f42
#2341471 - tvlsim: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f42
#2341351 - simcrs: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f42
#2339878 - airinv: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f42
#2362349