Comments

250 Comments

The binaries do not link to the shared library, so there is no dependency between the packages.

$ ldd /usr/bin/xxhsum 
    linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffc461f8000)
    libc.so.6 => /lib64/libc.so.6 (0x00007f49c9746000)
    /lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f49c9956000)

The binaries read from stdin when there is a pipe or redirection:

echo 'xxx' | xxhsum
xxhsum < filename

If stdin is a tty it considers this "Wrong parameters".

karma

This is installable.

BZ#1686679 librados2 not installable due to rogue libcrc32.so dep

This update makes devscripts installable.

BZ#1680371 nothing provides perl(GitLab::API::v4::Constants)
karma

Update is not installable due to missingdependency:

Problem: cannot install the best update candidate for package devscripts-2.18.4-1.fc29.x86_64
  - nothing provides perl(GitLab::API::v4::Constants) needed by devscripts-2.19.2-3.fc29.x86_64
karma

Fixes the missing #include <KHR/khrplatform.h>

BZ#1657356 Trying to compile against glext.h without having mesa-libEGL-devel installed
BZ#1641797 Missing Requires: python2-pygments

Dear maintainer,

this update has now spent 4 weeks in updates-testing. Is there a reason why it has not yet been pushed to stable? Especially since it is marked as a security update.

Dear maintainer,

this update has now spent 4 weeks in updates-testing. Is there a reason why it has not yet been pushed to stable? Especially since it is marked as a security update.

karma

Works with glibc-headers 2.27 + libattr-devel 2.4.48 (attr/xattr.h → sys/xattr.h)

Works with python-ipyparallel update FEDORA-2018-3fe9e5e2f1

texlive-jadetex-7:20170520-29.fc28 is missing Provides: jadetex that was present in texlive-jadetex-6:svn40855-42.fc28.2texlive-jadetex-6:svn40855-42.fc28.2

This means the package can not be updated because other packages requires this provides:

dnf repoquery --whatrequires jadetex

docbook-utils-pdf-0:0.6.14-44.fc28.noarch

Since we currently are in beta freeze, this will take same time to reach stable. So can we have a buildroot override?

With this I could build js-jsroot in F28 which failed to build with the previous version.

Hi! Did anyone see any issues with this update? The comment above that this EPEL 7 update should have a -1 karma vote because a different EPEL 6 update got a number of -1 karma votes, does not make sense. The issues with the EPEL 6 update do not automatically apply to the EPEL 7 update.