Comments

63 Comments

@hreindl

"not everybody is using bodhi and giving karma" No, but some are, and you treat them very disrespectfully by ignoring their feedback and not communicating.

"one bugreport is even linked here" If you refer to #1572944, that wasn't mentioned until after the very latest (but maybe not the last, hmmmm?) build removal.

"the decision pushing updates to stable is based on kown[sic] bugs and karma" What I'm concerned with is the decision to not push to stable, but instead remove and reset without a word.

If you took half the energy you use on defending bad practices, and used it to improve the workflow, Fedora would be in a much better state. As it is, this update still has no karma, 4.16.7 for fc27 (until a few days ago the latest release) is not even in Bodhi yet three days after release, and the previous one for fc27 still has zero karma.

I've been using Fedora exclusively for almost ten years (since FC10), as I prepared to upgrade to FC28 I thought to myself "Why?". Instead I'll prepare to upgrade to Slackware. That gives the added bonus of not having Systemd shoved down my throat. Thank you for these years, I especially liked FC17 and FC21.

@hreindl Except no testers mentioned any issues, or gave negative karma, including the update it obsoleted. Only positive karma followed by removal and reset, and then rinse & repeat.

What is the point of testing this? This is the FOURTH build in a row, the update has gotten positive karma eight times, for a grand total of currently zero. It has reached the stable threshold three times, only to be removed and reset all three times, and it's not even in testing yet. Would it be that difficult to push something out? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bait-and-switch

karma

Works for me, kernel regression tests passed. What's happening with test gating, another Bodhi error?

karma

WFM, regression tests passed

User Icon jag commented & provided feedback on xmms2-0.8-49.fc27 3 years ago
karma

I also checked +1 for the non-free content bug, but that seems to vanish like the kernel regression test results

User Icon jag commented & provided feedback on xmms2-0.8-49.fc27 3 years ago
karma

No problems here

karma

Works for me, 4.15.12 does not. Did a warm boot after upgrade, system works as expected. No warnings from kernel regression performance test, as in 4.15.12

karma

Agreed, setting negative karma

Many warnings in kernel regression performance test, which took a long time

Breaks Nvidia module build

karma

Works for me. Some earlier update (probably kernel-related) broke network after suspend, and intermittent suspend problems because of gam_server refusing to sleep, but I don't know where it came from and it's gone now.

Might as well not bother with this, 4.15.6 is building right now, will be in Koji very soon (and will most probably obsolete this one anyway)

karma

It should be possible to edit your comments within say five minutes of posting

Retpoline compiler regression

karma

Any special reason why +1 for kernel regression tests won't show up like karma and critpath?

karma

WFM

karma

Default test suite, fail in cachedrop

Can't really give positive karma for bz #1516515 as I'm not authorized to know what it is

(please don't put secret bugs in the feedback list)

BZ#1516515 Invalid bug number
karma

Works for me

karma

Works for me