I'm assuming the inclusion of bug #124129 is a mistake. :)

cool. works for me.

as kushal says :)

Tested; can no longer reproduce formerly-easy-to-reproduce bug #1215329. Thanks!

Oooh, I wish I had realized this was in updates-testing a few days earlier — there's apparently actually a fairly serious regression from 2.4.59

Tested with a DNG file, tweaked some random modules, exported -- works for me.

Tested with DNG; tried various modules. Works as expected.

Tested on my laptop -- offline updates work after following test procedure in https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test-announce/2015-January/000985.html

Thanks! New logos look to be in the right spot; installs with no issue on my f21 test system.

I don't have the expertise to really test this, but -- if this is to go in F21, please push it very soon, as the freeze is tomorrow.

Much better!

Note that this appears to be something glitchy with RPM, because if I take out the python3 conditional (flattening to assume that that's always true), it does the right thing.

$ rpm -qRp python-boto-2.34.0-3.fc21.noarch.rpm /usr/bin/python2 python(abi) = 2.7 python-requests python-rsa python3-requests python3-rsa $ rpm -qRp python3-boto-2.34.0-3.fc21.noarch.rpm python(abi) = 3.4 Looks like the requirements meant for the subpackage are ending up in the main package. :(

Did basic tests in EC2. Saves 68MB on disk!

Updated system, seems to run fine -- some errors in journal but I think they're f20->21 upgrade cruft, not this update. Also I actually tested this several hours ago and apparently forgot to log it, so... it's been working fine for a while now. :)

Tested outside of Atomic with Fedora Server beta RC4; installed with a vg with tons of free space; docker storage setup correctly resized and created logical volumes

To confirm: OVERWRITE: command not found is expected "fix works!" result. Unless you have an actual command on your system for some reason. :)

Tested on Fedora 21 cloud image. Works for me, and behavior test now gives an error instead of outputting "OOPS"

looks good

On the Scientific Linux system I have quick access to, installing this pulls in glibc.i686 on a 64-bit system. A quick look at the deps (rpm -qRp) shows "libc.so.6" in addition to "libc.so.6()(64bit)"