Comments
mooninite
@drepetto your comment is on a Fedora 29 update. If you are trying to install a Fedora 30 package on Fedora 29 that is not supported. There is a Fedora 30 update. In any case there is a wine-filesystem package. It has not gone anywhere.
Did anyone actually test this update? Problem: glib-networking-2.60.1-2.fc30.i686 has inferior architecture - cannot install both glib-networking-2.60.2-1.fc30.x86_64 and glib-networking-2.60.1-2.fc30.x86_64 - cannot install both glib-networking-2.60.1-2.fc30.x86_64 and glib-networking-2.60.2-1.fc30.x86_64 - cannot install the best update candidate for package glib-networking-2.60.1-2.fc30.i686 - cannot install the best update candidate for package glib-networking-2.60.1-2.fc30.x86_64
@rspliet I see the same thing. Ticket raised with releng.
@srxavi I have title bar rounding with Gnome and this update. No regressions seen in addons or browsing.
I'm seeing a regression in my Ansible code base due to the change in behavior of get_url with Check Mode. Reported upstream: https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/54180
@srxavi I have round titlebars on firefox-65.0.2-1.fc29.x86_64. I haven't tested this 66 update yet, though.
The fixed package is wine-4.2-2. Notice the '-2'. You are still seeing wine-4.2-1 because the '-2' update has not been pushed to testing yet. Bodhi will announce when the update has been pushed.
No regressions seen.
No regressions seen.
Yes, I just took a few days off for the holidays. 4.0-rc4 has now been submitted to testing.
Please don't build a wine update for a very minor documentation update again.
FYI: 3.16 fixes the Battle.net issue.
The spam has finally stopped. This is the update that should have been released.
I know this breaks Battle.net so I'm not pushing it to stable.
This update has been unpushed.
No regressions noticed.
The log spam still exists. Not an improvement. Will update bug report.
Needs to hit stable.
Correct, it was the symlink that was corrupted that caused apps to not see the library. The -4 build fixes this.
It is still troubling that there are +1s here for a package that does not work.
No regressions seen.