Per the update policy, under the "Philosophy" section, "Releases of the Fedora distribution are like releases of the individual packages that compose it. A major version number reflects a more-or-less stable set of features and functionality. As a result, we should avoid major updates of packages within a stable release. Updates should aim to fix bugs, and not introduce features, particularly when those features would materially affect the user or developer experience. The update rate for any given release should drop off over time, approaching zero near release end-of-life; since updates are primarily bugfixes, fewer and fewer should be needed over time." https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy This is a major version update of the package, breaking backwards compatibility with the previous major version. I suggest finding an alternate solution. It is already noted here that this will break functionality for one package (Pulp)

Per the update policy, under the "Philosophy" section, "Releases of the Fedora distribution are like releases of the individual packages that compose it. A major version number reflects a more-or-less stable set of features and functionality. As a result, we should avoid major updates of packages within a stable release. Updates should aim to fix bugs, and not introduce features, particularly when those features would materially affect the user or developer experience. The update rate for any given release should drop off over time, approaching zero near release end-of-life; since updates are primarily bugfixes, fewer and fewer should be needed over time." https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy This is a major version update of the package, breaking backwards compatibility with the previous major version. I suggest finding an alternate solution. It is already noted here that this will break functionality for one package (Pulp)

Per the update policy, under the "Philosophy" section, "Releases of the Fedora distribution are like releases of the individual packages that compose it. A major version number reflects a more-or-less stable set of features and functionality. As a result, we should avoid major updates of packages within a stable release. Updates should aim to fix bugs, and not introduce features, particularly when those features would materially affect the user or developer experience. The update rate for any given release should drop off over time, approaching zero near release end-of-life; since updates are primarily bugfixes, fewer and fewer should be needed over time." https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy This is a major version update of the package, breaking backwards compatibility with the previous major version. I suggest finding an alternate solution. It is already noted here that this will break functionality for one package (Pulp)

Per the update policy, under the "Philosophy" section,

"Releases of the Fedora distribution are like releases of the individual packages that compose it. A major version number reflects a more-or-less stable set of features and functionality. As a result, we should avoid major updates of packages within a stable release. Updates should aim to fix bugs, and not introduce features, particularly when those features would materially affect the user or developer experience. The update rate for any given release should drop off over time, approaching zero near release end-of-life; since updates are primarily bugfixes, fewer and fewer should be needed over time."

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy

This is a major version update of the package, breaking backwards compatibility with the previous major version. I suggest finding an alternate solution.

It is already noted here that this will break functionality for one package (Pulp)