Works for me, thanks. It's affected by the Firefox bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1508827 like the other packaged add-ons, though.
@mastaiza This is what upstream released. The release notes above say, for example, that ClearClick and ABE are not yet implemented. That's not a reason to give -1 karma. Older version doesn't work with FF57 at all, so I'm not going to unpush this update just because some features are missing. It's better to have some features than none at all.
There seems to be a new dependency, python3-pyroute2 that is not mentioned either in this update release notes or in rpm changelog. It looks like this was added in https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/commit/a1a3ddaa41c0a2b5d17b004bdf3b87a1337eaecc but it's not mentioned anywhere else that I could find.
There's unannounced ABI breakage in this update:
$ abipkgdiff --d1 libfastjson-debuginfo-0.99.6-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm --d2 libfastjson-debuginfo-0.99.7-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm --devel1 libfastjson-devel-0.99.6-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm --devel2 libfastjson-devel-0.99.7-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm libfastjson-0.99.6-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm libfastjson-0.99.7-1.fc26.x86_64.rpm ================ changes of 'libfastjson.so.4.1.0'=============== Functions changes summary: 3 Removed, 1 Changed (57 filtered out), 4 Added functions [...]
There should be NO removed and NO changed items. Please test each update for ABI changes in the future.
FYI this breaks rsyslog compiled with 0.99.7 but running with 0.99.6 installed.
@michalvala If this were true, this update would've been marked as
newpackage. It's marked as
bugfix. Also, this is F27 update, not F26, so I don't know why you're talking about .fc26 package. Builds just for testing without the expectation they'll reach stable, should be released via COPR, not updates-testing.
Thanks for the report. This doesn't happen on my machine. Was mozilla-noscript the only package you updated? Can you try reproducing with a clean user profile and only mozilla-noscript package installed (no other Firefox addons)? Which Firefox version? Please open a separate bug report if this is reproducible.