FEDORA-2015-1532cc0a3c

bugfix update in Fedora 22 for python-pyspf

Status: stable 3 years ago

This update provides a complete/correct fix for bug #1232595, from Bojan Smojver.

Comments 14

This update has been submitted for testing by adamwill.

This update has been pushed to testing.

makes me not happy: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232595#c15, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232595#c9 talking about 'so that I can push fixed pypolicyd-spf as well' - so frankly how is this supposed to be handeled in a proper way not breaking things as long as not both packages are in sync and what does that mena for other packages

combination of python-pyspf-2.0.11-3.fc22.noarch AND pypolicyd-spf-1.3.1-4.fc22.noarch works now fine

karma: +1 #1232595: +1

This update has been submitted for stable by bodhi.

Agree with @hreindl. The combination of both packages works properly for me as well.

karma: +1 #1232595: +1

Taskotron: upgradepath test FAILED on noarch. Result log: https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/resultsdb/results/5004758 (results are informative only)

@adamwill: Could we merge this update with pypolicyd-spf-1.3.1-4.fc22 before we push this to stable? If we don't, we'll break people's systems (whoever has pypolicyd-spf installed in F-22 will be broken). I totally didn't realize this before. Sorry.

@adamwill: Could we merge this update with pypolicyd-spf-1.3.1-4.fc22 before we push this to stable? If we don't, we'll break people's systems (whoever has pypolicyd-spf installed in F-22 will be broken). I totally didn't realize this before. Sorry.

@adamwill: Could we merge this update with pypolicyd-spf-1.3.1-4.fc22 before we push this to stable? If we don't, we'll break people's systems (whoever has pypolicyd-spf installed in F-22 will be broken). I totally didn't realize this before. Sorry.

@adamwill: Could we merge this update with pypolicyd-spf-1.3.1-4.fc22 before we push this to stable? If we don't, we'll break people's systems (whoever has pypolicyd-spf installed in F-22 will be broken). I totally didn't realize this before. Sorry.

This update has been pushed to stable.

Sorry about all that spam (bodhi was hanging for me). And, of course, for breaking your systems. :-( I'll be submitting pypolicyd-spf for stable the moment bodhi unlocks that package.

sorry, folks, I didn't realize they had to go together - I read the BZ comment as meaning python-pyspf had to go first, not as both of them having to go together.

Add Comment & Feedback

Please login to add feedback.

Content Type
RPM
Status
stable
Test Gating
Submitted by
Update Type
bugfix
Update Severity
high
Karma
+2
stable threshold: 2
unstable threshold: -3
Autopush (karma)
Enabled
Autopush (time)
Disabled
Dates
submitted 3 years ago
in testing 3 years ago
in stable 3 years ago

Related Bugs 1

0+2 #1232595 Improper use of python's ipaddress

Automated Test Results