This update provides a complete/correct fix for bug #1232595, from Bojan Smojver.
This update has been submitted for testing by adamwill.
This update has been pushed to testing.
makes me not happy: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232595#c15, see https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1232595#c9 talking about 'so that I can push fixed pypolicyd-spf as well' - so frankly how is this supposed to be handeled in a proper way not breaking things as long as not both packages are in sync and what does that mena for other packages
combination of python-pyspf-2.0.11-3.fc22.noarch AND pypolicyd-spf-1.3.1-4.fc22.noarch works now fine
This update has been submitted for stable by bodhi.
Agree with @hreindl. The combination of both packages works properly for me as well.
Taskotron: upgradepath test FAILED on noarch. Result log: https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/resultsdb/results/5004758 (results are informative only)
@adamwill: Could we merge this update with pypolicyd-spf-1.3.1-4.fc22 before we push this to stable? If we don't, we'll break people's systems (whoever has pypolicyd-spf installed in F-22 will be broken). I totally didn't realize this before. Sorry.
This update has been pushed to stable.
Sorry about all that spam (bodhi was hanging for me). And, of course, for breaking your systems. :-( I'll be submitting pypolicyd-spf for stable the moment bodhi unlocks that package.
sorry, folks, I didn't realize they had to go together - I read the BZ comment as meaning python-pyspf had to go first, not as both of them having to go together.
Please login to add feedback.
Copyright © 2007-2019 Red Hat, Inc. and
bodhi is Free Software.
if you have any problems. Read the documentation.