Ansible v2 upstream rewrite with many bugfixes and new features. See upstream changelog for details: https://github.com/ansible/ansible/blob/devel/CHANGELOG.md
Ansible v2 with many bugfixes and new features. See upstream changelog for details: https://github.com/ansible/ansible/blob/devel/CHANGELOG.md
Please log in to add feedback.
This update has been submitted for testing by toshio.
This update has obsoleted ansible-2.0.0.1-1.fc23, and has inherited its bugs and notes.
This update has been pushed to testing.
Works fine for me.
Everything worked with the ad-hoc commands I attempted and the playbooks I tested
Works
This is an
enhancementupdate, not abugfixupdate. Because playbooks need porting to remain functional, I believe that this update does not belong in Fedora 22 or 23, as per the Fedora updates policy.This update has reached 7 days in testing and can be pushed to stable now if the maintainer wishes
Although I'm definitely excited for Ansible 2.0, I agree with mavit. This is not a backwards-compatible update and is not in line with the update policy. This will break many people's automation and will result in a very poor user experience.
I agree with some of the other downvoters. Ansible 2.0 is great and I thank you for maintaining the package, but please only put 2.0 in Rawhide so that users don't have to port their playbooks except on a major OS upgrade as per the packaging guidelines.
I just tested my ansible 1.9 playbooks on 2.0 and 2.0 is not backwards-compatible.
karma: -1
Hi,
My company uses F23 for workstations and relies on ansible for mission critical deployments and other work.
An incompatible update from a simple dnf upgrade would have a negative impact and cause instability in our environment and workload. Thank you.
karma: -1
I found broken yum module on none-utf8 locales: https://github.com/ansible/ansible/issues/13975
This update broke my playbooks.
Ansible 2.0 is (with a few rare exceptions where it rejects something that 1.9.x permitted, but was incorrect) compatible playbook wise with 1.9.x.
Could everyone here who has hit a playbook that doesn't work with 2.0, but does work with 1.9 file a ticket upstream or a bug report in bugzilla. We want upstream ansible to fix these cases and release 2.0.x with those fixes before we push to stable.
This update has been obsoleted by ansible-2.0.1.0-2.fc23.
I'm seeing very little negative karma on the new update ansible-2.0.1.0-2.fc23 . If you experienced problems with the ansible 2.0 upgrade please test the updated package and provide feedback!