================================================================================================================
Package Arch Version Repository Size
================================================================================================================
Upgrading:
texlive noarch 6:2016-48.20160520.fc28 @commandline 36 k
texlive-base x86_64 7:20170520-38.fc28 @commandline 931 k
Transaction Summary
Upgrade 2 Packages
Total size: 967 k
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
Running transaction check
Transaction check succeeded.
Running transaction test
Error: Transaction check error:
file /usr/share/texmf from install of texlive-base-7:20170520-38.fc28.x86_64 conflicts with file from package R-core-3.4.4-1.fc28.x86_64
Error Summary
Also, after upgrade, I still get this error from pdflatex:
! LaTeX Error: File `fvextra.sty' not found.
@pdestefa, you should remove R first then update texlive. There were some file conflicts in R prior to version R-3.5.0-4.fc28 and the work around is just to re-install R-3.5.0-4.fc28 after installing texlive. I think in your case, texlive was not successfully updated due to a file conflict from an old version of R.
@pdestefa : The texlive-2016-48.20160520.fc28 package has a new texlive-fvextra subpackage, which Provides: tex(fvextra.sty). The texlive-base-20170520-38.fc28 package (which generates the texlive-pythontex subpackage) has been changed so that texlive-pythontex has an explicit Requires: tex(fvextra.sty).
Your log shows you upgrading texlive and texlive-base. Try upgrading texlive-pythontex (it should pull in texlive-fvextra as a dependency).
Ah! Okay, I didn't understand what the text in this update meant. I found an update package on updates-testing.
However, my MWE still will not build, although the error is not related to fvextra, now. Since I only changed -pythontex and -fvextra pkgs, I'm worried one of them introduced some new problem. I see this now:
...
[1{/usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/fonts/map/pdftex/updmap/pdftex.map}]
[2] (./standalone.aux)
kpathsea: Running mktexpk --mfmode / --bdpi 600 --mag 0+438/600 --dpi 438 txsys
mktexpk: don't know how to create bitmap font for txsys.
mktexpk: perhaps txsys is missing from the map file.
kpathsea: Appending font creation commands to missfont.log.
)
!pdfTeX error: pdflatex (file txsys): Font txsys at 438 not found
==> Fatal error occurred, no output PDF file produced!
==
...
So, poking around a bit, I became suspicious of mktexpk and looked into updmap. I had some old .texlive/ directories, which I deleted, and I reran updmap systemwide. Does that sound right?
My MWE now builds and seems to look okay, although I'm worried why I had to rebuild the updmap.
This update has reached 7 days in testing and can be pushed to stable now if the maintainer wishes
This update has been submitted for testing by spot.
During install of package, I get this error:
================================================================================================================ Package Arch Version Repository Size ================================================================================================================ Upgrading: texlive noarch 6:2016-48.20160520.fc28 @commandline 36 k texlive-base x86_64 7:20170520-38.fc28 @commandline 931 k
Transaction Summary
Upgrade 2 Packages
Total size: 967 k Is this ok [y/N]: y Downloading Packages: Running transaction check Transaction check succeeded. Running transaction test Error: Transaction check error: file /usr/share/texmf from install of texlive-base-7:20170520-38.fc28.x86_64 conflicts with file from package R-core-3.4.4-1.fc28.x86_64
Error Summary
Also, after upgrade, I still get this error from pdflatex: ! LaTeX Error: File `fvextra.sty' not found.
This update has been pushed to testing.
Bodhi is disabling automatic push to stable due to negative karma. The maintainer may push manually if they determine that the issue is not severe.
Works for me.
@pdestefa, you should remove R first then update texlive. There were some file conflicts in R prior to version R-3.5.0-4.fc28 and the work around is just to re-install R-3.5.0-4.fc28 after installing texlive. I think in your case, texlive was not successfully updated due to a file conflict from an old version of R.
I did remove R to install the package, but that didn't solve the problem with fvextra.sty missing. Did you really test it? I did.
@pdestefa : The texlive-2016-48.20160520.fc28 package has a new texlive-fvextra subpackage, which Provides: tex(fvextra.sty). The texlive-base-20170520-38.fc28 package (which generates the texlive-pythontex subpackage) has been changed so that texlive-pythontex has an explicit Requires: tex(fvextra.sty).
Your log shows you upgrading texlive and texlive-base. Try upgrading texlive-pythontex (it should pull in texlive-fvextra as a dependency).
Ah! Okay, I didn't understand what the text in this update meant. I found an update package on updates-testing.
However, my MWE still will not build, although the error is not related to fvextra, now. Since I only changed -pythontex and -fvextra pkgs, I'm worried one of them introduced some new problem. I see this now:
... So, poking around a bit, I became suspicious of mktexpk and looked into updmap. I had some old .texlive/ directories, which I deleted, and I reran updmap systemwide. Does that sound right?
My MWE now builds and seems to look okay, although I'm worried why I had to rebuild the updmap.
This update has reached 7 days in testing and can be pushed to stable now if the maintainer wishes
This update has been obsoleted by texlive-base-20170520-39.fc28.