Funny detail: rpm -ql libssh-0.8.1-3 lists libssh_threads.so.4 but if you check the filesystem the link isn't there. It looks like the reason is that it points to a link and not a file! I will fix it.
If you browse the libssh-0.8.1-3 RPM package, the link is there, but RPM doesn't install it to the file system because it points to a symlink! I find this strange. However use:
@mooninite: I installed it on 3 systems and had no trouble with it. Not everyone has the same set of packages on their systems, so no everyone will hit the same problems.
This update has been submitted for testing by asn.
This update has obsoleted libssh-0.8.1-2.fc28, and has inherited its bugs and notes.
This update has been pushed to testing.
Works here.
No regressions noted.
This update has been submitted for batched by bodhi.
This update has been submitted for stable by bodhi.
This update has been pushed to stable.
It's missing link in /usr/lib64:
libssh_threads.so.4 -> libssh.so.4.5.1
Funny detail:
rpm -ql libssh-0.8.1-3
lists libssh_threads.so.4 but if you check the filesystem the link isn't there. It looks like the reason is that it points to a link and not a file! I will fix it.Cheers; There is a link
libssh_threads.so.4.5.1
but not just a major version, though.If you browse the libssh-0.8.1-3 RPM package, the link is there, but RPM doesn't install it to the file system because it points to a symlink! I find this strange. However use:
FEDORA-2018-4794ce5b1f
Temporary Fix:
This is a SONAME version bump in a stable Fedora release.
Please rebuild every package that depends on libssh.
Shame on testers for +1s on this.
See bug 1618616.
Your assertion is incorrect, the latest build preserves sonames as far as I can tell.
Correct, it was the symlink that was corrupted that caused apps to not see the library. The -4 build fixes this.
It is still troubling that there are +1s here for a package that does not work.
I'm surprised then how -3 is working fine for me. <shrug>
@mooninite: I installed it on 3 systems and had no trouble with it. Not everyone has the same set of packages on their systems, so no everyone will hit the same problems.