wfm: desktop 16GB Intel i7-3770 CPU, laptop 8GB Intel i5-2520M CPU Lenovo T420 - all using the Mate Desktop Environment (again the desktop is more than 10 times faster than the laptop -- NB in 4.20.5 the laptop was slightly faster than the desktop [both under 10 seconds] , much to my amazement)
BZ#1678685 CVE-2019-8912 kernel: af_alg_release() in crypto/af_alg.c neglects to set a NULL value for a certain structure member, which leads to a use-after-free in sockfs_setattr
BZ#1678686 CVE-2019-8912 kernel: af_alg_release() in crypto/af_alg.c neglects to set a NULL value for a certain structure member, which leads to a use-after-free in sockfs_setattr [fedora-all]
Works for me..
The Default and Performance Regression tests pass OK. AMD 965, x86_64 work station, Plasma DE, X-server, nVidia card GTX 650 (GK107) + nVidia RPM's from Negativo17.
The problem reported in Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 1678755 for kernel-4.20.8, when powertop was run appears fixed for me in kernel 4.20.11, so thanks for that.
Computer: HP Pavilion 15 Notebook PC (G5F00EA#ABU) (Haswell)
CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-4005U CPU @ 1.70GHz
Feb 26 14:45:04 kernel: [Firmware Bug]: AMD-Vi: IOAPIC[4] not in IVRS table
Feb 26 14:45:04 kernel: [Firmware Bug]: AMD-Vi: IOAPIC[5] not in IVRS table
Feb 26 14:45:04 kernel: [Firmware Bug]: AMD-Vi: No southbridge IOAPIC found
BZ#1678685 CVE-2019-8912 kernel: af_alg_release() in crypto/af_alg.c neglects to set a NULL value for a certain structure member, which leads to a use-after-free in sockfs_setattr
0
1
BZ#1678686 CVE-2019-8912 kernel: af_alg_release() in crypto/af_alg.c neglects to set a NULL value for a certain structure member, which leads to a use-after-free in sockfs_setattr [fedora-all]
This update has been submitted for testing by jforbes.
This update has been pushed to testing.
wfm: desktop 16GB Intel i7-3770 CPU, laptop 8GB Intel i5-2520M CPU Lenovo T420 - all using the Mate Desktop Environment (again the desktop is more than 10 times faster than the laptop -- NB in 4.20.5 the laptop was slightly faster than the desktop [both under 10 seconds] , much to my amazement)
No issues noted using i3-7100T x86_64 8GB RAM laptop with external monitor
Works great, regression test suite passes with both:
Works on T450s and XS35GTv2.
Works great.
Also fixes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677858 which is a perf/powertop regression in 4.20.10 at least compared to 4.20.8
Works. No regressions found, seems to be in order.
No regressions spotted on IvyBridge / Radeon HD 7670m hybrid.
Works on T480s with i7-8650U
x86_64, CPU i5-7200U w/embedded GPU, model HP850G4, KDE5, VirtualBox, VPN IPsec/OpenVPN
Tested on virtual machine with AMD Ryzen 5 2400G.
works fine on old Dell Latitude E6510 I5
works fine on Dell
Works for me..
The Default and Performance Regression tests pass OK. AMD 965, x86_64 work station, Plasma DE, X-server, nVidia card GTX 650 (GK107) + nVidia RPM's from Negativo17.
works fine for me on i7-5820K and kvm. regression test passed both environment.
The problem reported in Red Hat Bugzilla – Bug 1678755 for kernel-4.20.8, when powertop was run appears fixed for me in kernel 4.20.11, so thanks for that. Computer: HP Pavilion 15 Notebook PC (G5F00EA#ABU) (Haswell) CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i3-4005U CPU @ 1.70GHz
No regressions noted.
Works great! LGTM! =)
Tested on Dell Inspiron 7580 (2018) with i7-8565U and 16 Gig RAM - works perfectly! No more Segfaults from powertop. No regressions found.
Thank you!
LGTM
Works on my end.
No regressions on T480s iGPU.
lgtm pass default kernel test
+1
No regressions, Thinkpad X250
No problems
Intel(R) Celeron(R) J4105 - powertop no longer crashing
no regressions noted
Works fine, no regressions found on Lenovo E560, kernel tests passed except for paxtest as usual
This update has been submitted for batched by jforbes.
This update has been submitted for stable by jforbes.
It looks like nobody noticed that 4.20.11-200.fc29 is not shipping nouveau driver:
A serious regression for me.
Actually, scratch that. It looks like dnf didn't install kernel-modules-4.20.11 and I haven't noticed. Sorry for the false alarm. All is fine.
This update has been pushed to stable.
$ uname -a Linux fedora 4.20.8-200.fc29.x86_64
dnf --security --refresh upgrade
doesn't offer this kernel. Is this really security update ?
@boycottsystemd1 https://ask.fedoraproject.org/en/question/112064/how-to-synchronise-the-latest-version-of-fedora-repo-available-with-my-computer/#112078
If you rerun
dnfcommand with-vparameter, it will tell you from when is the metadata you're downloading - it'll probably still be the previous one.Lenovo ideapad 330 15-ARR AMD 2700u Radeon Vega
Fingers crossed, looks much better ...
Feb 26 14:45:04 kernel: [Firmware Bug]: AMD-Vi: IOAPIC[4] not in IVRS table Feb 26 14:45:04 kernel: [Firmware Bug]: AMD-Vi: IOAPIC[5] not in IVRS table Feb 26 14:45:04 kernel: [Firmware Bug]: AMD-Vi: No southbridge IOAPIC found
@ozeszty thank you
no sound in palemoon
ALSA lib pcm_dmix.c:1108:(snd_pcm_dmix_open) unable to open slave