This update provides the final version of the Fedora 32 wallpapers, including an animated version available for GNOME and MATE (though not installed by default due to lack of time).
Updates may require up to 24 hours to propagate to mirrors. If the following command doesn't work, please retry later:
sudo dnf upgrade --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2020-8ed3d94b26
Please login to add feedback.
This update has been submitted for testing by luya.
This update's test gating status has been changed to 'waiting'.
This update has obsoleted f32-backgrounds-32.1.0-1.fc32, and has inherited its bugs and notes.
This update's test gating status has been changed to 'ignored'.
This update has been pushed to testing.
Seems fine on a few devices and screen sizes.
Seems fine on FHD resolution
This update can be pushed to stable now if the maintainer wishes
Seems fine
This update has been submitted for stable by luya.
LGTM. Why this isn't pushed? Is there a freeze exception missing? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:SOP_freeze_exception_bug_process
I filed out a report https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1824216 with freeze exception
I'm voting -1 on this because the 'Supplements' dependencies are clearly incorrect, as discussed in bug. I think that should be fixed before this goes out.
Looks like shit!
https://leigh123linux.fedorapeople.org/pub/screenshots/Screenshot%20from%202020-04-17%2013-32-22.png
Looks very nice, but Supplements are wrong.
Supplements still have to be replaced by Recommends.
adamwill edited this update.
New build(s):
Removed build(s):
Karma has been reset.
This update has been submitted for testing by adamwill.
OK, I've edited this update to the 32.1.2-1.fc32.1 build, which AFAICS fixes the Recommends but doesn't change much else. 32.1.2 seems identical to 32.1.1 upstream, not sure what's going on with that.
@luya please do not change the build in the update again, as I am going to pull this build into RC 4 and we then must keep it at the same version unless we respin again and change it. If we ship RC 4, we must push the exact version of every package it contains stable, so if an update is edited to include a different build in the meantime, that gives us a problem. Thanks!
adamwill edited this update.
Btw: the animated background looks better than f32.xml. Because it doesn't have a weird
zoom
which makes it more sharp ;) Switch from f32.xml to animated.xml and compare the size of the crystall, than you will see what i mean ;)adamwill edited this update.
New build(s):
Removed build(s):
Karma has been reset.
I have no idea if latest version is now in rc4. Any way, given karma again.
It isn't, no. RC 4 got 32.1.2-1.fc32.1, which 'corrected' the Supplements to Recommends, causing the animated packages to be pulled into the Workstation and MATE images...and that actually made the Workstation image go oversize. So we will do an RC 5 with 32.1.2-2.fc32, which drops the Recommends so there just aren't any soft deps at all any more; this will mean the images don't get the -animated packages any more, and Workstation should be under its size limit. I'm just rounding up other fixes needed for RC 5 before we run it.
This update has been pushed to testing.
adamwill edited this update.
Hmm, i tested f32-backgrounds-32.1.2-2.fc32 again. Now the background has a pink point in the middle. Adam, please recheck the update before making a rc5.
The pink is intentional. (If you think it's a bug, please post a screenshot on imgur so we can see what you're looking at.)
Already posted at bugreport. Honestly , this new and wasn't in previous version. PS. you simply download the rpm to sse the proplem ;)
error.....: Ps: you can simply download the RPM and you'll see the problem for yourself
it's not new, it was in all previous versions of this update. The image file itself has not changed across all of this fun, only the packaging bits around it. That pink spot has been there ever since 32.1.1.
@raveit The fix for zoomed default background is applied upstream. I will wait for 32.1.2-2 getting pushed first after launch then release 32.1.3 afterward.
Seems OK.
This update can be pushed to stable now if the maintainer wishes
This update has been submitted for stable by adamwill.
This update has been pushed to stable.