Works for me.. It's been running for an hour or so now with no issues noticed. The enabled Default and Performance tests pass OK.
AMD 965, x86_64 Work Station (legacy BIOS) SSD's > RAID1. Plasma DE from Zawertun's COPR. nVidia GT1030 card using nVidia RPM's from RPMFusion (515.57)
*** I’m intensely curious as to the reason for why sedna seems to randomly fluctuate between short (normally under 11 minutes) & extremely long (100+ minutes) elapsed times for the performance test!
This update has been submitted for testing by jforbes.
This update's test gating status has been changed to 'waiting'.
Default & performance tests pass (KVM)
Works for me.. It's been running for an hour or so now with no issues noticed. The enabled Default and Performance tests pass OK.
AMD 965, x86_64 Work Station (legacy BIOS) SSD's > RAID1. Plasma DE from Zawertun's COPR. nVidia GT1030 card using nVidia RPM's from RPMFusion (515.57)
This update's test gating status has been changed to 'passed'.
Seems to be working OK native and as a VirtualBox guest.
Across 5 runs of the kernel regression tests (native not virtual) I managed to get one cachedrop failure.
This update has been pushed to testing.
This update can be pushed to stable now if the maintainer wishes
Works for me: all using the Mate Desktop Environment.
sirius: desktop 16GB Intel i7-3770 CPU desktop (SSD + 5 hard drives in RAID-6) real:10m12.064s user:4m36.980s sys:5m0.948s
sedna: laptop 8GB Intel i5-2520M CPU Lenovo T420 (SSD only) real:10m2.710s user:4m4.079s sys:4m54.772s
mercury: laptop 32GB AMD Ryzen 7 5700U with Radeon 5500 Graphics (SSD only) rea1:14m34.578s user:6m44.911s sys:5m56.232s
*** I’m intensely curious as to the reason for why sedna seems to randomly fluctuate between short (normally under 11 minutes) & extremely long (100+ minutes) elapsed times for the performance test!
Works.
i7-9700K(UHD Graphics 630): kernel regression test passed. Works fine for daily use.
No problems using it since yesterday on a laptop and two NUCs. Default and performance tests passed on all three.
Dell XPS 13 9350 [Intel Core i7-6560U CPU @ 2.20GHz × 4, Mesa Intel Iris Graphics 540] and two NUC6i5SYK [Intel Core i5-6260U CPU @ 1.80GHz × 4, Mesa Intel Iris Graphics 540] .
Both test past on baremetal.
works for me
works
works for me
Working fine on an AMD desktop
This kernel breaks cifs mounts. My fstab line is
//odroidxu4.local/julian /mnt/openmediavault cifs credentials=/home/julas/.credentials,uid=julas,gid=julas,vers=3.1.1,nostrictsync,_netdev,x-systemd.automount,noauto 0 0
It works with 5.18.7, with 5.18.8 error 22 (invalid argument) is returned.
Seems to work fine on bare-metal Z77, 3770K, RX570 with UEFI. No issues to report so far and kernel regression tests both PASS.
@belegdol do you have a BZ for the cifs issue?
Works on Acer Aspire Intel® Core™ i7-3632QM CPU @ 2.20GHz Memory: 15.4 GiB of RAM Graphics Processor: Mesa DRI Intel® HD Graphics 4000. Passed all kernel regression tests. wi-fi: Qualcomm Atheros AR9485 Wireless Network Adapter vendor: Lite-On driver: ath9k v: kernel pcie: speed: 2.5 GT/s lanes: 1
@nixuser, no BZ but I am discussing the issue on linux-cifs.
Thanks, I can also confirm cifs mounts are broken with this kernel, and 5.18.7 works.
Everything working as expected. Default and performance regression test suites also passed on both my systems:
(Even though kernel-tests won't let me upload performance test suite results because of a server crash)
This update has been obsoleted by kernel-5.18.9-200.fc36.