The 5.16.8 stable kernel update contains a number of important fixes across the tree.
sudo dnf upgrade --refresh --advisory=FEDORA-2022-33ec204d7d
This update has been submitted for testing by jforbes.
This update's test gating status has been changed to 'waiting'.
Works in normal use on laptop. Both default and performance kernel regression tests passed on:
(1) NUC6i5SYK, Intel® Core™ i5-6260U CPU @ 1.80GHz × 4, Mesa Intel® Iris(R) Graphics 540 (SKL GT3) and
(2) Dell XPS 13 9350, Intel® Core™ i7-6560U CPU @ 2.20GHz × 4, Mesa Intel® Iris(R) Graphics 540 (SKL GT3)
Works for me: all using the Mate Desktop Environment.
sirius: desktop 16GB Intel i7-3770 CPU desktop (SSD + 5 hard drives in RAID-6)
real:10m18.667s user:4m36.396s sys:5m6.478s
sedna: laptop 8GB Intel i5-2520M CPU Lenovo T420 (SSD only)
real:9m41.363s user:3m46.512s sys:4m48.671s
mercury: laptop 32GB AMD Ryzen 7 5700U with Radeon 5500 Graphics (SSD only)
rea1:14m39.467s user:6m45.780s sys:5m52.828s
*** I’m intensely curious as to the reason for why sedna seems to randomly fluctuate between short (under 11 minutes) & extremely long (109+ minutes) elapsed times for the performance test!
This update's test gating status has been changed to 'passed'.
Looks ok for me. Works on baremetal (non UEFI mode) AMD Ryzen5 3600, Mainboard MSI B450M Mortar Max with prop. nvidia driver (510.47.03) from rpmfusion.org (GTX980 card). Works with Gnome-Desktop (Xorg). Regression test passed.
Sorry for spamming, still crashing on boot because of Bug #2048093
Looks okay on NUC7
Default & performance tests pass (KVM)
Works for me...
The regression tests pass OK. AMD 965, x86_64 work station (legacy BIOS). SSD's > RAID1. Plasma DE from Zawertun's COPR. Running Xorg, nVidia GT1030 card using nVidia RPM's from RPMFusion (510.47.03)
Works on Acer Aspire Intel® Core™ i7-3632QM CPU @ 2.20GHz Memory: 15.4 GiB of RAM Graphics Processor: Mesa DRI Intel® HD Graphics 4000. Passed all kernel regression tests. Return from suspension works.
This update has been pushed to testing.
This update can be pushed to stable now if the maintainer wishes
I don't know what caused this issue, but I got hundreds of lines of scriptlet errors when upgrading to kernel-devel from this update:
Installing : kernel-devel-5.16.8-200.fc35.x86_64 13/27
Running scriptlet: kernel-devel-5.16.8-200.fc35.x86_64 13/27
hardlink: cannot link ./Documentation/kbuild/Kconfig.recursion-issue-01 to /usr/src/kernels/5.16.5-200.fc35.x86_64/./Documentation/kbuild/Kconfig.recursion-issue-01.hardlink-temporary: File exists
hardlink: cannot link ./Documentation/kbuild/Kconfig.select-break to /usr/src/kernels/5.16.5-200.fc35.x86_64/./Documentation/kbuild/Kconfig.select-break.hardlink-temporary: File exists
hardlink: cannot link ./Documentation/userspace-api/media/Makefile to /usr/src/kernels/5.16.5-200.fc35.x86_64/./Documentation/userspace-api/media/Makefile.hardlink-temporary: File exists
(and thousands more lines like these)
Looks like they reference the wrong kernel version (5.16.5, should be 5.16.8?)
Full log from the failed scriptlet here: https://gist.github.com/decathorpe/55a821a98b6cc39a1c1fca7cede78325
Seems to be working OK here.
LGTM, Lenovo Yoga Slim 7 Pro 14ACH5, CPU AMD Ryzen 9 5900hx, GPU AMD Renoir, Wifi Mediatek mt7921e
Unfortunately still an issue on t490s: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2050036
Works great on Lenovo T480! LGTM! =)
Default test and the Performance test - PASS (VMware)
Just a reminder "unfortunately still an issue" is not a reason for negative karma unless an update specifically says it fixes that bug. Yes, there are outstanding issues, and I am going through them as quickly as I can, but giving negative karma for what is not a new regression is like saying your bug is more important than every fix included in a kernel update, and no one should be allowed those fixes until your bug is fixed.
This update has been submitted for stable by jforbes.
I thought karma is there to have those issues raised during testing and from 5.15 perspective and trying to upgrade I believe this qualifies as a regression. But if this is something we don't want to karma on I do apologise.
And just to add this was in no way criticism on your work or it's pace. Getting those issues addressed is much appreciated!
@markec It is for issues raised during testing which are a regression from the current release. As 5.16.7 is the current stable kernel for Fedora 34 and Fedora 35, a new regression from 5.16.7 to 5.16.8 needs to be considered, but there are a number of issues with 5.16.7, and 5.16.8 does fix some of those, so let's allow those users who do get fixes in 5.16.8 to actually get them, and continue working to fix the outstanding issues for a future update.
Kernel Regression passed. Ran on bare metal 3700X and RTX 2060. Suspend issue also fixed that came up in 5.16.6 and 5.16.7.
Wanted to add that I tested both the general and performance tests.
This update has been pushed to stable.
Please login to add feedback.
Confirm request to re-trigger tests.
Copyright © 2007-2022 Red Hat, Inc. and
bodhi-server 6.0.1 on
bodhi is Free Software.
if you have any problems. Read the documentation.