We already had 102.2.0. The 91.x series is discontinued, 91.13 was the last release, there won't be any more security fixes either, I think continuing with the 102 series is the right thing to do.
I think continuing with the 102 series is the right thing to do.
It very well might be, but you still need to follow the Updates Policy. Pushing breaking changes into a stable release is not allowed, especially without any communication. You should ask FESCo for an exception if you need one.
This update has been submitted for testing by erack.
This update's test gating status has been changed to 'waiting'.
This update's test gating status has been changed to 'passed'.
This update has been submitted for stable by bodhi.
This update has been pushed to stable.
Thunderbird 102 is known to bring incompatible changes to existing addons, was it really necessary to push it into a stable Fedora release?
We already had 102.2.0. The 91.x series is discontinued, 91.13 was the last release, there won't be any more security fixes either, I think continuing with the 102 series is the right thing to do.
It very well might be, but you still need to follow the Updates Policy. Pushing breaking changes into a stable release is not allowed, especially without any communication. You should ask FESCo for an exception if you need one.