Trivial but #960923 still not correct. From /etc/init.d/clamd: ========== #
pidfile: /var/run/clamav/clamd.pid # config: /etc/clamd.conf ... rm -f
/var/run/clamav/clamav.pid =========== /etc/clamd.conf states: PidFile
/var/run/clamav/clamd.pid So the comment in /etc/init.d/clamd is correct,
but the actual 'rm' command is not.
This package can reach the stable repository only after 14 days in testing or
with enough positive karma, thus at 2013-10-22. Mentioned #960923 does not have
real impact , but would just delay a stable push of this package.
This update has reached 14 days in testing and can be pushed to stable now if the maintainer wishes
This update has been submitted for testing by robert.
This update is currently being pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing updates repository.
This update is currently being pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing updates repository.
This update is currently being pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 testing updates repository.
This update has been pushed to testing
Trivial but #960923 still not correct. From /etc/init.d/clamd: ========== # pidfile: /var/run/clamav/clamd.pid # config: /etc/clamd.conf ... rm -f /var/run/clamav/clamav.pid =========== /etc/clamd.conf states: PidFile /var/run/clamav/clamd.pid So the comment in /etc/init.d/clamd is correct, but the actual 'rm' command is not.
other than #960923 seems to work fine
The package for el6 was released meanwhile. So does that have a fix maybe that could be transfered for the el5-package here as well now?
This package can reach the stable repository only after 14 days in testing or with enough positive karma, thus at 2013-10-22. Mentioned #960923 does not have real impact , but would just delay a stable push of this package.
This update has reached 14 days in testing and can be pushed to stable now if the maintainer wishes
This update has been submitted for stable by robert.
This update is currently being pushed to the Fedora EPEL 5 stable updates repository.
This update has been pushed to stable